Mark Sexton
Date: 18 November 2025 at 09:57
Dear Lady Chief Justice, Secretary of State for Justice, Attorney General, Chair of
PACAC and Commissioner Rowley
Re: URGENT - Constitutional Correspondence Requiring Immediate Response
Please find attached constitutional correspondence dated 18 November 2025, which has also been issued to each of you today by Royal Mail Special Delivery in order to ensure confirmed delivery.
The matters set out in the attached document are of immediate constitutional and criminal significance and require your direct personal attention.
As stated within the correspondence, a written response from each of you is required within seven (7) days.
Once your reply is received, the meeting which is mentioned in the correspondence document can then be arranged.
Yours sincerely
Ian Clayton
Lead Investigator
Ethical Approach UK)
Attd: Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025 (PDF)
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL FAILINGS UNDERMINING THE
RULE OF LAW, WITH BEARING ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND MATTERS OF OVERWHELMING PUBLIC INTEREST
Date: 18 November 2025
To:
The Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales
(Baroness Sue Carr)
The Secretary of State for Justice (The Right Honourable David Lammy MP)
The Attorney General for England and Wales (Baron Richard Hermer)
The Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) (The Right
Honourable Simon Hoare MP)
Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service (Sir Mark Rowley)
Re: CRN 6029679/21 - Proven Criminal and Constitutional Violations Connected to Operation Talla
This correspondence brings to your notice and attention damning evidence of unlawful conduct, systematic concealment and constitutional collapse within policing, government and the justice system.
The evidence establishes beyond doubt that Crime Reference Number 6029679/21 was unlawfully shut down, outside all statutory frameworks and under the influence of a national command structure which extinguished investigative independence across the United Kingdom.
What follows is not speculation, suggestion, or belief. The evidence within our possession proves this.
1. CRN 6029679/21 - The Evidence Proves This Crime Report Was Never fully Investigated in Accordance with Statutory Duties
The following facts are now beyond dispute:
More than 400 victim, witness, expert and whistleblower statements were submitted.
Not one victim, witness, whistleblower or expert was contacted.
No investigative steps whatsoever were properly pursued in accordance with statutory requirements.
The case was closed by Deputy Assistant Commissioner Jane Connors and Detective Superintendent Tor Garnett.
The closure coincided exactly with national commands issued under Operation Talla.
The Speirs Directive of 25 January 2022 explicitly ordered police staff not to accept or record vaccine-related crime reports. This is established as fact through documentation held by Police Scotland, obtained via FOI and corroborated by multiple NPCC admissions.
The crime report must now be re-opened immediately, in full compliance with:
the National Crime Recording Standard,
the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996,
the Code for Crown Prosecutors and
Article 2 ECHR obligations.
Failure to do so would compound the criminality.
2. Criminal Investigation Into the Unlawful Closure of CRN 6029679/21
As matters of fact, the following criminal offences have been committed:
Perverting the course of justice
Misconduct in public office
Nonfeasance in public office
Misfeasance in public office
Assisting offenders
Corporate and negligence offences
These offences were committed by named senior police officers, Members of Parliament and regulatory officials.
The question is not “whether” these crimes were committed.
The question is:
Why were these crimes committed and under whose authority? And specifically:
Why were all vaccine-related crime reports, including CRN 6029679/21, shut down under an unlawful national directive?
The evidence demonstrates a deliberate, coordinated pattern that cannot be reconciled with lawful policing or independent criminal investigation.
Right across the UK, there are very many victims of these crimes (both those reported in the case of CRN 6029679/21 and in consequence, also the crimes relating to its unlawful and unconstitutional closure).
These victims are entitled to remedy, redress and accountability and it is intolerable that these people have been and are continuing to be substantially ignored by those who have stood aside from their duties of protection.
3. Operation Talla and the Speirs Directive - National Command Interference Established
The Speirs Directive, along with additional documentary evidence, proves that Operation Talla was not a “coordination framework” but a national command structure which:
issued instructions on the advice of the NPCC,
transmitted those instructions via UK Gold Command,
unlawfully directed forces to suppress entire categories of crime reporting,
operated across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, ignoring devolved policing structures.
This is not conjecture.
This is evidenced, documented and verified.
Police Scotland disclosed the directive in full.
No English or Welsh police force has done so, because:
they refuse,
they obstruct,
or they label lawful FOI requests as “vexatious.”
The Police Scotland disclosure is the unfiltered directive. It directly contradicts public statements and sworn Covid Inquiry testimony by senior policing leaders.
4. Constitutional Collapse - Established by Evidence
This matter now engages:
the independence of policing across the UK,
unlawful national command interference,
systemic obstruction of criminal investigations,
breaches of CPIA 1996,
breaches of the duty of candour,
breaches of Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998,
and the integrity of judicial decision-making.
The evidence proves a systemic collapse of constitutional safeguards and the rule of law.
This is not expressed as possibility.
This is a demonstrated reality.
5. Background - The Record Must Be Stated Clearly
5.1 Covid Inquiry
The Covid Inquiry has repeatedly confirmed that criminal conduct falls outside its remit and must be reported to the police. This was done.
The police refused to investigate because they were ordered not to.
5.2 Judicial Review
A Judicial Review was sought to compel a lawful investigation.
The JR was refused.
The appeal was refused.
It is now proven that the Metropolitan Police:
withheld reference to Operation Talla,
withheld the Speirs Directive,
withheld their CPIA obligations,
withheld the fact that national instructions had shut down all related crime reports.
The Court ruled without the evidence it was entitled to.
The Police’s omissions led to a judgment based on material non-disclosure, causing constitutional harm and obstructing justice.
5.3 HMICFRS Report - April 2021
The HM Inspectorate of Constabulary confirmed:
the police misinterpreted government guidance as law,
officers believed ministerial instructions were binding law,
police acted as coercive agents of government.
HMICFRS warned:
“The police must be seen to be enforcing criminal law, not to appear to act as the coercive agents of ministers.”
These findings are consistent with and reinforce, the documented national suppression of criminal reporting under Operation Talla.
We must also add, that the House of Lords Constitution Committee, in June 2021, had then delivered a damning indictment of policing during the pandemic [ The 3rd Report by the Select Committee on the Constitution, of Session 2021–22 refers ], stating unequivocally that, “public health advice was incorrectly enforced by the police as though it were law.”
This is a formal parliamentary finding that UK policing acted ultra vires, unlawfully restricting civil liberties, violating Articles 5 and 6 ECHR and executing arrests and prosecutions without statutory basis.
The evidence we hold confirms that this same unlawful policing culture was not accidental but operationalised, expanded and enforced through Operation Talla, culminating in the suppression of criminal reports, including the unlawful shutdown of CRN 6029679/21.
6. How This Matter Now Needs to Proceed
Given the criminality, concealment and constitutional implications, this matter cannot be delegated to subordinates.
We require a direct response from each of you:
What steps will you now take and by what mechanism, to address these criminal and constitutional violations?
A meeting must now take place.
We will attend jointly to outline the evidence and for next steps to be confirmed.
Our evidential dossier cannot be provided in advance, for it to be reviewed prior to such a meeting.
The dossier will be provided in person, at the meeting, to the appropriate constitutional office-holders.
7. Required Response
We now request that you:
Acknowledge receipt
Confirm your position and intended action within seven days of receiving this correspondence.
The gravity of these issues and their implications for constitutional stability, national security and the rule of law, requires immediate and direct action. Every other avenue of reporting has been exhausted and involved institutions have simply engaged in a circular loop of non-accountability, which is why this current correspondence to yourselves is an essential step.
We await your response.
Yours sincerely
Ian Clayton (Lead Investigator - Ethical Approach UK) and
Mark Sexton (Retired Police Constable)
Reply Postal Address:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXX
Reply email address: